Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] clk: qcom: clk-rpm: add msm8960 compatible

Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.phone-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <isuyh5tebydvld2lxolpx3ukunmzn27mx2pkamsu4wmolnnyp7@defpphasqnit>
On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 01:36:48PM +0000, Antony Kurniawan Soemardi wrote:
> On 6/1/2026 6:38 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 03:51:17PM +0700, Antony Kurniawan Soemardi via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > From: Antony Kurniawan Soemardi <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > Add support for the "qcom,rpmcc-msm8960" compatible string to the
> > > RPM clock driver.
> > > 
> > > msm8960 uses the same RPM clock descriptions as apq8064, so reuse
> > > rpm_clk_apq8064 for this compatible.
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Rudraksha Gupta <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Antony Kurniawan Soemardi <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c | 1 +
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > 
> > On the other hand... You have added APQ8064 strings as a fallback. Is
> > this change really needed until you actually have SoC-specific quirks?
> 
> The fallback was recommended by Konrad in the initial review:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> 
> As for SoC specific quirks, I don't have anything planned right now about it
> though...

So, I think, this patch can be dropped. The entry for APQ8064 should
work already.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.