Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: qcom,pmic-glink: Add compatible string for SM8475
Esteban Urrutia <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:40:58 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.phone-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/31/26 12:28 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Somehow I confabulated the generic compatible being present in the > driver... I was trying to explain that >=20 > And yes I didn't notice the 8350/8450 difference. But anyway, the > resolution will be one of: >=20 > // 8450 is fully compatible > "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink", > "qcom,sm8450-pmic-glink", > "qcom,pmic-glink" >=20 > or >=20 > // 8475 is special > "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink", > "qcom,pmic-glink" >=20 > depending on what you believe is more correct. I think the first > one fits better. Yes, I agree the first case fits better, but I believe there is also a possible third case: // 8550 is fully compatible "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink", "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink", "qcom,pmic-glink" The reason why I believe this is that I've found SM8475 to include some elements such as eUSB or PHY sequences found in more recent SoCs such as SM8550. I guess that's the case since SM8475 is a respin, but I'm not sure. Regards, Esteban