Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: qcom,pmic-glink: Add compatible string for SM8475

Esteban Urrutia <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:40:58 +0000
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.phone-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/31/26 12:28 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Somehow I confabulated the generic compatible being present in the
> driver... I was trying to explain that
>=20
> And yes I didn't notice the 8350/8450 difference. But anyway, the
> resolution will be one of:
>=20
> // 8450 is fully compatible
> "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink",
> "qcom,sm8450-pmic-glink",
> "qcom,pmic-glink"
>=20
> or
>=20
> // 8475 is special
> "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink",
> "qcom,pmic-glink"
>=20
> depending on what you believe is more correct. I think the first
> one fits better.

Yes, I agree the first case fits better, but I believe there is also a
possible third case:

// 8550 is fully compatible
"qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink",
"qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink",
"qcom,pmic-glink"

The reason why I believe this is that I've found SM8475 to include some
elements such as eUSB or PHY sequences found in more recent SoCs such as
SM8550.
I guess that's the case since SM8475 is a respin, but I'm not sure.

Regards,
Esteban