Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: embedded-controller: qcom,hamoa-crd-ec: Add qcom,tsens

On 28/07/2026 19:44, Anvesh Jain P wrote:
> Add the qcom,tsens property so Hamoa-based boards can list the tsens
> providers, and how many leading sensor IDs on each, whose readings the
> driver averages to compute the SoC junction temperature reported to
> the EC for fan control.
> 
> The generic thermal-sensors property has no standard semantic for
> selecting a range of sensor IDs from a provider without enumerating
> each one, so a vendor-specific phandle-array with an explicit sensor
> count is used instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anvesh Jain P <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../embedded-controller/qcom,hamoa-crd-ec.yaml     | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/embedded-controller/qcom,hamoa-crd-ec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/embedded-controller/qcom,hamoa-crd-ec.yaml
> index c07483aa5937..ec809fcd03ab 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/embedded-controller/qcom,hamoa-crd-ec.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/embedded-controller/qcom,hamoa-crd-ec.yaml
> @@ -33,11 +33,40 @@ properties:
>    interrupts:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  # A generic "thermal-sensors" phandle only identifies individual sensor
> +  # IDs, and thermal zones are a Linux-side grouping of those sensors, not
> +  # a devicetree concept the EC cares about. What the driver actually needs
> +  # is raw readings from a contiguous range of leading sensor IDs on each
> +  # tsens provider, averaged together, so qcom,tsens pairs each provider
> +  # phandle with a count instead of enumerating every sensor cell.
> +  qcom,tsens:


What is the point of having internal review and then IGNORE that review?

NAK

Best regards,
Krzysztof