Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: adju st screenpad power/brightness handling — regression on no n-DUO ScreenPad (ASUS ZenBook UX435EG)

Denis Benato <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Aug 2026 18:07:33 +0200
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.platform-driver-x86,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/1/26 20:03, Manuel A. R. de Orúe Ríos wrote:
> Hi Denis, Luke,
>
> I'm following up on this patch series (commit 034f5efd362fb87a3970d61eaf982664f84e6c5a,
> merged for kernel 7.0.10) — I believe I've found and confirmed a regression it
> introduces on non-DUO ScreenPad hardware.
>
> Hardware: ASUS ZenBook UX435EG (BIOS UX435EG.315), single ScreenPad model
> (not ScreenPad Plus / DUO).
>
> Symptom: after upgrading past kernel-7.0.9-205 to kernel-7.0.10-200 (and
> confirmed still present in 7.1.5), the ScreenPad stops functioning as a
> secondary display entirely — it still works as a touchpad (separate i2c-hid
> digitizer), but the panel itself never lights up as a screen.
>
> I bisected this cleanly across official Fedora kernel builds:
>   kernel-7.0.9-205.fc44   -> works
>   kernel-7.0.10-200.fc44  -> broken
>   kernel-7.1.5-201.fc44   -> still broken
>
>
> image.png
> I understand from the review thread that this series was tested specifically
> on a ZenBook DUO — it's very possible the DUO's ScreenPad firmware/EC
> behaves differently enough that the polarity works out correctly there, while
> it's inverted on this single-ScreenPad model.
>
> Happy to test any proposed fix on this hardware, or provide more DMI/ACPI/
> debug info if useful. I'm currently working around this with a udev-triggered
> script forcing bl_power=4 on boot, but would obviously prefer a proper fix.
>
> Kernel/hardware details:
> DMI: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ZenBook UX435EG_UX435EG/UX435EG, BIOS UX435EG.315 04/22/2022
> Distro: Fedora Linux 44 (KDE Plasma)
>
> Thanks for the work on this — I know these ScreenPad quirks are a pain to
> get right across the different hardware variants.
>
> Best,
> ___________________________


Please try the below patch and see if it fixes things for you:

From e9f4d0ef00c4f3e1ba26db68a688e523a743e733 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denis Benato <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 16:05:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix unclear usage of bd->props.power
The bd->props.power is checked in parts of the driver correctly comparing with
BACKLIGHT_POWER_ON, while in others with a raw usage of bd->props.power
and !bd->props.power, moreover in certain checks the logic has been
inverted due to BACKLIGHT_POWER_ON being defined as 0: fix both the wrong
usage and the inconsistencies by using proper comparisons.
Signed-off-by: Denis Benato <[email protected]>
---
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
index 8610663b8269..3600dddd8f36 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
@@ -4500,7 +4500,8 @@static int update_screenpad_bl_status(struct backlight_device *bd)
u32 ctrl_param = bd->props.brightness;
int err = 0;
- if (bd->props.power) {
+ switch (bd->props.power) {
+ case BACKLIGHT_POWER_ON:
err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_SCREENPAD_POWER, 1, NULL);
if (err < 0)
return err;
@@ -4508,12 +4509,17 @@static int update_screenpad_bl_status(struct backlight_device *bd)
err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_SCREENPAD_LIGHT, ctrl_param, NULL);
if (err < 0)
return err;
- }
+ break;
- if (!bd->props.power) {
+ case BACKLIGHT_POWER_OFF:
err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_SCREENPAD_POWER, 0, NULL);
if (err < 0)
return err;
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ pr_warn("Invalid screenpad backlight power state: %d\n", bd->props.power);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
return err;
-- 
2.47.3