Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: adju st screenpad power/brightness handling — regression on no n-DUO ScreenPad (ASUS ZenBook UX435EG)
Denis Benato <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Aug 2026 18:07:33 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.platform-driver-x86,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/1/26 20:03, Manuel A. R. de Orúe Ríos wrote: > Hi Denis, Luke, > > I'm following up on this patch series (commit 034f5efd362fb87a3970d61eaf982664f84e6c5a, > merged for kernel 7.0.10) — I believe I've found and confirmed a regression it > introduces on non-DUO ScreenPad hardware. > > Hardware: ASUS ZenBook UX435EG (BIOS UX435EG.315), single ScreenPad model > (not ScreenPad Plus / DUO). > > Symptom: after upgrading past kernel-7.0.9-205 to kernel-7.0.10-200 (and > confirmed still present in 7.1.5), the ScreenPad stops functioning as a > secondary display entirely — it still works as a touchpad (separate i2c-hid > digitizer), but the panel itself never lights up as a screen. > > I bisected this cleanly across official Fedora kernel builds: > kernel-7.0.9-205.fc44 -> works > kernel-7.0.10-200.fc44 -> broken > kernel-7.1.5-201.fc44 -> still broken > > > image.png > I understand from the review thread that this series was tested specifically > on a ZenBook DUO — it's very possible the DUO's ScreenPad firmware/EC > behaves differently enough that the polarity works out correctly there, while > it's inverted on this single-ScreenPad model. > > Happy to test any proposed fix on this hardware, or provide more DMI/ACPI/ > debug info if useful. I'm currently working around this with a udev-triggered > script forcing bl_power=4 on boot, but would obviously prefer a proper fix. > > Kernel/hardware details: > DMI: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ZenBook UX435EG_UX435EG/UX435EG, BIOS UX435EG.315 04/22/2022 > Distro: Fedora Linux 44 (KDE Plasma) > > Thanks for the work on this — I know these ScreenPad quirks are a pain to > get right across the different hardware variants. > > Best, > ___________________________ Please try the below patch and see if it fixes things for you: From e9f4d0ef00c4f3e1ba26db68a688e523a743e733 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Benato <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 16:05:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix unclear usage of bd->props.power The bd->props.power is checked in parts of the driver correctly comparing with BACKLIGHT_POWER_ON, while in others with a raw usage of bd->props.power and !bd->props.power, moreover in certain checks the logic has been inverted due to BACKLIGHT_POWER_ON being defined as 0: fix both the wrong usage and the inconsistencies by using proper comparisons. Signed-off-by: Denis Benato <[email protected]> --- drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c index 8610663b8269..3600dddd8f36 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c @@ -4500,7 +4500,8 @@static int update_screenpad_bl_status(struct backlight_device *bd) u32 ctrl_param = bd->props.brightness; int err = 0; - if (bd->props.power) { + switch (bd->props.power) { + case BACKLIGHT_POWER_ON: err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_SCREENPAD_POWER, 1, NULL); if (err < 0) return err; @@ -4508,12 +4509,17 @@static int update_screenpad_bl_status(struct backlight_device *bd) err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_SCREENPAD_LIGHT, ctrl_param, NULL); if (err < 0) return err; - } + break; - if (!bd->props.power) { + case BACKLIGHT_POWER_OFF: err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_SCREENPAD_POWER, 0, NULL); if (err < 0) return err; + break; + + default: + pr_warn("Invalid screenpad backlight power state: %d\n", bd->props.power); + return -EINVAL; } return err; -- 2.47.3