Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix current password length check
"Mark Pearson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.platform-driver-x86,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2026, at 9:20 AM, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> current_password_store() checks the password length before removing the
> trailing newline, which can reject valid passwords that are exactly
> ->maxlen bytes long.
>
> It also passes ->maxlen to strscpy(), which truncates passwords without
> a newline.
>
> Use strchrnul() to measure the password length up to the newline, then
> copy that many bytes and add a trailing NUL terminator.
>
> Fixes: a40cd7ef22fb ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Add WMI interface
> support on Lenovo platforms")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c
> b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c
> index e215e86e3db7..860224dc8c21 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c
> @@ -436,16 +436,14 @@ static ssize_t current_password_store(struct
> kobject *kobj,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> struct tlmi_pwd_setting *setting = to_tlmi_pwd_setting(kobj);
> - size_t pwdlen;
> + size_t pwdlen = strchrnul(buf, '\n') - buf;
>
> - pwdlen = strlen(buf);
> /* pwdlen == 0 is allowed to clear the password */
> if (pwdlen && ((pwdlen < setting->minlen) || (pwdlen > setting->maxlen)))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - strscpy(setting->password, buf, setting->maxlen);
> - /* Strip out CR if one is present, setting password won't work if it
> is present */
> - strreplace(setting->password, '\n', '\0');
> + memcpy(setting->password, buf, pwdlen);
> + setting->password[pwdlen] = '\0';
> return count;
> }
Change is good.
Only minor note is that I hate to lose the comment explaining why we're losing the CR. Can we put that back in above the strchrnul operation?
Mark