Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: sync: Add abstraction for synchronize_rcu()

On Tue Jun 23, 2026 at 1:04 PM CEST, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> with a hyper-strict definition (note that I'm unsure whether calling
> synchronize_rcu() in atomic context is actually even defined behavior;
> I think it is. I'm just brainstorming here)

From the Rust side of things this is well defined; please see [1] and [2].

However, given the kernel context, things such as deadlocks have more
consequences than in userspace. Which is why it is still desirable to catch them
(e.g. with tools like klint).

[1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html
[2] https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/behavior-not-considered-unsafe.html