Re: [PATCH for-next v3 3/9] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf()

Harry Yoo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.rcu,dev.linux.lists.linux-rt-devel,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 6/24/26 11:28 PM, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 08:05:57PM +0900, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
>> Teach kfree_rcu_sheaf() how to handle the !allow_spin case. Try to get
>> an empty sheaf from pcs->spare or the barn even when spinning is not
>> allowed. Unlike __pcs_replace_full_main(), try harder to allocate
>> an empty sheaf because the fallback path will be more expensive than
>> kfree_nolock().
>>
>> When trylock fails or the kernel observes non-NULL pcs->rcu_free after
>> lock acquisition, free the sheaf instead of putting it to the barn.
>> This is rare and not worth complicating the code.
>>
>> Since call_rcu() cannot be called in an unknown context,
>> kfree_rcu_sheaf() fails when the rcu sheaf becomes full.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  mm/slab.h        |  2 +-
>>  mm/slab_common.c |  2 +-
>>  mm/slub.c        | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
>> index 509f330654b8..b1bd33a16544 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab.h
>> +++ b/mm/slab.h
>> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static inline bool is_kmalloc_normal(struct kmem_cache *s)
>>  	return !(s->flags & (SLAB_CACHE_DMA|SLAB_ACCOUNT|SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT));
>>  }
>>  
>> -bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj);
>> +bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, bool allow_spin);
>>  void flush_all_rcu_sheaves(void);
>>  void flush_rcu_sheaves_on_cache(struct kmem_cache *s);
>>  
>> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
>> index b6426d7ceec9..bc1a8ec938d9 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>> @@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ static bool kfree_rcu_sheaf(void *obj)
>>  
>>  	s = slab->slab_cache;
>>  	if (likely(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) || slab_nid(slab) == numa_mem_id()))
>> -		return __kfree_rcu_sheaf(s, obj);
>> +		return __kfree_rcu_sheaf(s, obj, /* allow_spin = */ true);
> 
> Since this is stacked on top of the slab alloc flags work, could it pass slab
> alloc flags instead of allow_spin?

Good point.

Hmm, I thought we'll eventually introduce SLAB_FREE_ flags rather than
reusing SLAB_ALLOC_ flags (and then translate SLAB_FREE_NOLOCK to
SLAB_ALLOC_NOLOCK when allocating sheaves) rather than reusing
SLAB_ALLOC_ flags...

>> @@ -6065,7 +6074,7 @@ static void rcu_free_sheaf(struct rcu_head *head)
>>   */
>>  static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(kfree_rcu_sheaf_map, LD_WAIT_CONFIG);
>>  
>> -bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj)
>> +bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, bool allow_spin)
>>  {
>>  	struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs;
>>  	struct slab_sheaf *rcu_sheaf;
>> @@ -6081,9 +6090,10 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj)
>>  	pcs = this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_sheaves);
>>  
>>  	if (unlikely(!pcs->rcu_free)) {
>> -
>>  		struct slab_sheaf *empty;
>>  		struct node_barn *barn;
>> +		unsigned int alloc_flags = SLAB_ALLOC_DEFAULT;
> 
> which would make this logic more natural.

Right.

>> +		gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOWAIT;
>>  
>>  		/* Bootstrap or debug cache, fall back */
>>  		if (unlikely(!cache_has_sheaves(s))) {
>> @@ -6103,7 +6113,7 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj)
>>  			goto fail;
>>  		}
>>  
>> -		empty = barn_get_empty_sheaf(barn, true);
>> +		empty = barn_get_empty_sheaf(barn, allow_spin);
>>  
>>  		if (empty) {
>>  			pcs->rcu_free = empty;
>> @@ -6112,20 +6122,25 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj)
>>  
>>  		local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
>>  
>> -		empty = alloc_empty_sheaf(s, GFP_NOWAIT, SLAB_ALLOC_DEFAULT);
>> +		if (unlikely(!allow_spin)) {
>> +			alloc_flags = SLAB_ALLOC_TRYLOCK;
>> +			gfp = 0;
>
> and this as well (alloc_empty_sheaf() could derive gfp from whatever you
> passed it, by simply knowing alloc_flags = TRYLOCK -> gfp = 0
> (or gfp &= ~__GFP_RECLAIM)).

Right.

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQQ1ub6gR5ogjaKRmOGXBN6rc5S1gUCakImSwAKCRCGXBN6rc5S
1n9DAP9zhlN5ijXwjntBc0wlfFJAuqZardZzqd1PLSXx1SrTyAEA20oNG98gOTzG
A1Uncfq79JGJcEnkaLo9tcyk4f9Xog4=
=KrR/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.