Re: [PATCH 00/79] fs: new accessors for inode->i_ctime

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:45:05 -0400
> Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Most of this conversion was done via coccinelle, with a few of the more
> > non-standard accesses done by hand. There should be no behavioral
> > changes with this set. That will come later, as we convert individual
> > filesystems to use multigrain timestamps.
> 
> BTW, Linus has suggested to me that whenever a conccinelle script is used,
> it should be included in the change log.
> 

Ok, here's what I have. I note again that my usage of coccinelle is
pretty primitive, so I ended up doing a fair bit of by-hand fixing after
applying these.

Given the way that this change is broken up into 77 patches by
subsystem, to which changelogs should I add it? I could add it to the
"infrastructure" patch, but that's the one where I _didn't_ use it. 

Maybe to patch #79 (the one that renames i_ctime)?


------------------------8<------------------------------
@@
expression inode;
@@

- inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode)
+ inode_set_current_ctime(inode)

@@
expression inode;
@@

- inode->i_ctime = inode->i_mtime = current_time(inode)
+ inode->i_mtime = inode_set_current_ctime(inode)

@@
struct inode *inode;
expression value;
@@

- inode->i_ctime = value;
+ inode_set_ctime(inode, value);

@@
struct inode *inode;
expression val;
@@
- inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = val
+ inode_set_ctime_sec(inode, val)

@@
struct inode *inode;
expression val;
@@
- inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = val
+ inode_set_ctime_nsec(inode, val)

@@
struct inode *inode;
@@
- inode->i_ctime
+ inode_ctime_peek(inode)