Re: [PATCH RESEND] um: Remove CONFIG_REISERFS_FS from defconfig
Jan Kara <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:32:07 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.reiserfs-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-um |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20230918163207.3e2hev3zxnr3bakj@quack3> |
On Mon 18-09-23 16:58:05, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:26 PM Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon 18-09-23 12:58:26, Peter Lafreniere wrote: > > > ReiserFS has been deprecated for a year and a half, yet is still built > > > as part of a defconfig UML kernel. > > > > > > According to commit eb103a51640e ("reiserfs: Deprecate reiserfs"), the > > > filesystem is slated to be removed in 2025. Remove it from the defconfig > > > profile now, as part of its deprecation process. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Lafreniere <[email protected]> > > > > Makes sense but I've noticed there are many more architectures that define > > CONFIG_REISERFS_FS in their defconfig (sh, powerpc, mips, m68k, ia64, arm, > > alpha). So perhaps we should do this for all of them when we are at it? > > The policy for the m68k defconfigs is to enable all available exotic > file systems as modules, so support for them is available when needed. > > Please let me know why this should be changed, as long as ReiserFS is > still available in the upstream kernel. There's no need to change if you don't want to. I can just imagine how for other archs which seem to enable only "useful" filesystems in defconfig disabling a deprecated filesystem makes sense. Honza -- Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um