Re: [PATCH v1] rust: bug: prevent dead_code warning from warn_on!'s flags constant

"Gary Guo" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.rust-for-linux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon Jul 20, 2026 at 4:55 AM BST, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>
>
> Fix the following dead_code warning on some configurations in an
> atomic development branch:
>
> warning: constant `WARN_ON_FLAGS` is never used
>    --> /linux/rust/kernel/bug.rs:126:19
>     |
> 126 |               const WARN_ON_FLAGS: u32 = $crate::bug::bugflag_taint($crate::bindings::TAINT_WARN);
>     |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>     |
>    ::: /linux/rust/kernel/sync/srcu.rs:106:12
>     |
> 106 |           if crate::warn_on!(
>     |  ____________-
> 107 | |             // SAFETY: By the type invariants, `self` contains a valid and pinned `struct srcu_struct`
> 108 | |             // and `srcu_readers_active()` only checks the active reader count.
> 109 | |             unsafe { bindings::srcu_readers_active(ptr) }
> 110 | |         ) {
>     | |_________- in this macro invocation
>     |
>     = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
>     = note: this warning originates in the macro `crate::warn_on` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
>
> The warn_on! macro always defines a WARN_ON_FLAGS constant and hands it
> to warn_flags!. On configurations where warn_flags! does not reference
> its flags argument (the LOONGARCH/ARM variant, which only calls
> WARN_ON(), and the !CONFIG_BUG no-op variant), the constant is left
> unused and triggers a dead_code warning.
>
> The warning only surfaces for callers inside the kernel crate itself:
> uses from other crates expand an external macro, so the lint is
> suppressed there.
>
> Rename the constant to _WARN_ON_FLAGS so the underscore marks it as
> possibly-unused, matching the existing _COND_STR constant in the same
> macro. The name is still referenceable, so configurations that do use
> the flags are unaffected.
>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>
> ---
>  rust/kernel/bug.rs | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/bug.rs b/rust/kernel/bug.rs
> index ed943960f851..2fd7ee25abcb 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/bug.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/bug.rs
> @@ -123,9 +123,9 @@ macro_rules! warn_on {
>          const _COND_STR: &str = file!();
>  
>          if cond {
> -            const WARN_ON_FLAGS: u32 = $crate::bug::bugflag_taint($crate::bindings::TAINT_WARN);
> +            const _WARN_ON_FLAGS: u32 = $crate::bug::bugflag_taint($crate::bindings::TAINT_WARN);
>  
> -            $crate::warn_flags!(_COND_STR, WARN_ON_FLAGS);
> +            $crate::warn_flags!(_COND_STR, _WARN_ON_FLAGS);

Hmm, why bother adding a const for this rather than just invoke

    $crate::warn_flags!(
        _COND_STR,
        const { ... }
    )

?

Also, the proper fix would be to mark it as used in the `warn_flags` macro
that discard the expression.

    if false {
        _ = $flags;
    }

Best,
Gary

>          }
>          cond
>      }};
>
> base-commit: 880c43b185ca52239e75bc546cc4f4d9154d0fed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.