Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] rust: time: add Delta::to_jiffies_timeout() for timeout conversion

On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:06:10 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 2:05 AM FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Miguel, you suggested landing the minimum set, e.g. the first 2 or
>> first 4 patches. Patches 1-3 are already in, so that leaves patch
>> 4. Would you like to take this version, which clamps the result and
>> has a KUnit test that fails on arm with HZ=1000 without the clamp,
>> or should I hold it for early next cycle? Either is fine with me.
> 
> Up to timekeeping, but it is very late and I think Andreas was already
> on the fence of deferring everything even before this version.

Make sense, let's defer this. I will prepare it for the next cycle.

> If we were to actually take it, then I think that, generally speaking,
> any version that works in all cases is to be strongly favored even if
> it can be optimized/improved later, i.e. what I think matters the most
> is agreeing on the documented contract, i.e. to agree on what we want
> the function to actually do. Function bodies can always be improved
> later.

Agreed.