systemd_generator_t vs systemd_generator_type
Russell Coker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.selinux-refpolicy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1717302.MpC4nazLU5@liv> |
This combination of names is confusing. As a general rule I think we shouldn't have a type name be a substring of an attribute name. Having an attribute name as a substring of a type name is less of an issue but still best avoided. /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-bless-boot-generator /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-cryptsetup-generator /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-debug-generator /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-getty-generator /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-hibernate-resume-generator /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-rc-local-generator /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-run-generator /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-system-update-generator /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-veritysetup-generator /usr/lib/systemd/user-environment-generators/30-systemd-environment-d- generator Above are the generators on my system that run as systemd_generator_t. Would systemd_generator_generic_t/systemd_generator_generic_exec_t be an OK name? -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/