Re: systemd_generator_t vs systemd_generator_type

On 4/10/20 11:02 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
> This combination of names is confusing.  As a general rule I think we
> shouldn't have a type name be a substring of an attribute name.  Having an
> attribute name as a substring of a type name is less of an issue but still
> best avoided.
> 
> /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-bless-boot-generator
> /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-cryptsetup-generator
> /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-debug-generator
> /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-getty-generator
> /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-hibernate-resume-generator
> /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-rc-local-generator
> /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-run-generator
> /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-system-update-generator
> /lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-veritysetup-generator
> /usr/lib/systemd/user-environment-generators/30-systemd-environment-d-
> generator
> 
> Above are the generators on my system that run as systemd_generator_t.  Would
> systemd_generator_generic_t/systemd_generator_generic_exec_t be an OK name?

I'd accept a patch for this.

-- 
Chris PeBenito