Re: [PATCH] base chrome/chromium patch

Chris PeBenito <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.selinux-refpolicy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 1/12/21 5:11 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> This patch is the one I described as "another chromium patch" on the 10th of
> April last year, but with the issues addressed.
> 
> I believe it's ready for inclusion.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell Coker <[email protected]>
> 
> Chromium policy tweaks and DRI policy

[...]

> --- refpolicy-2.20201210.orig/policy/modules/apps/chromium.if
> +++ refpolicy-2.20201210/policy/modules/apps/chromium.if
> @@ -38,7 +38,15 @@ interface(`chromium_role',`
>   
>   	allow $2 chromium_t:process signal_perms;
>   	allow $2 chromium_renderer_t:process signal_perms;
> +	allow $2 chromium_sandbox_t:process signal_perms;
>   	allow $2 chromium_naclhelper_t:process signal_perms;
> +	allow chromium_t $2:process { signull signal };
> +	allow $2 chromium_t:file manage_file_perms;

I think I'm ok with the other parts, but is this a typo, manage on proc/pid entries?


-- 
Chris PeBenito
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.