unreserved_port_t

Russell Coker <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Mar 2021 21:26:37 +1100

Newsgroups	org.kernel.vger.selinux-refpolicy
Message-ID	<1956679.fmg26ZhMKt@liv>

How are we supposed to write policy for programs that bind to random unused 
ports >1024?  There doesn't seem to be any macro that allows binging to 
unreserved_port_t except corenet_tcp_bind_all_unreserved_ports() which is too 
permissive.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/

lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.