Re: unreserved_port_t

Dominick Grift <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.selinux-refpolicy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Russell Coker <[email protected]> writes:

> How are we supposed to write policy for programs that bind to random unused 
> ports >1024?  There doesn't seem to be any macro that allows binging to 
> unreserved_port_t except corenet_tcp_bind_all_unreserved_ports() which is too 
> permissive.

Seems like corenet_tcp_bind_unreserved_ports() is currently missing. Please
add. There is a corenet_tcp_bind_reserved_ports().


-- 
gpg --locate-keys [email protected]
Key fingerprint = FCD2 3660 5D6B 9D27 7FC6  E0FF DA7E 521F 10F6 4098
https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xDA7E521F10F64098
Dominick Grift
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.