Re: RFC: earlyinit_t
Russell Coker <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Jun 2026 17:38:47 +1000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.selinux-refpolicy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2563044.CQOukoFCf9@dojacat> |
On Friday, 19 June 2026 09:30:55 AEST Rahul Sandhu wrote: > I think the concern is less that and moreso when policy is loaded. Off > the top of my head, an example I can think of was one system I saw from > a little while back which had the policy binary in the initramfs itself > and hence loaded it midway through initramfs' setup and the switchroot. Who does that nowadays? https://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/07/24/se-linux-policy-loading/ I've written about my past tests with initrd policy and why I decided that was a bad idea. > Once policy is loaded however, I'm not aware of any _processes_ that do > persist beyond the initramfs. On my system, both journald and udev end > up re-exec'd for example. Great! -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/