Re: [PATCH v2] selinux: fix incorrect execmem checks on overlayfs

Paul Moore <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.selinux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Jul 14, 2026 Ondrej Mosnacek <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The commit fixing the overlayfs mmap() and mprotect() access checks
> failed to skip the execmem check in __file_map_prot_check() for the case
> where the "mounter check" is being performed. This check should be
> performed only against the credentials of the task that is calling
> mmap()/mprotect(), since it doesn't pertain to the file itself, but
> rather just gates the ability of the calling task to get an executable
> memory mapping in general.
> 
> The purpose of the "mounter check" is to guard against using an
> overlayfs mount to gain file access that would otherwise be denied to
> the mounter. For execmem this is not relevant, as there is no further
> file access granted based on it (notice that the file's context is not
> used as the target in the check), so checking it also against the
> mounter credentials would be incorrect.
> 
> Fix this by passing a boolean to [__]file_map_prot_check() and
> selinux_mmap_file_common() that indicates if we are doing the "mounter
> check" and skiping the execmem check in that case. Since this boolean
> also indicates if we use current_cred() or the mounter cred as the
> subject, also remove the "cred" argument from these functions and
> determine it based on the boolean and the file struct.
> 
> Fixes: 82544d36b172 ("selinux: fix overlayfs mmap() and mprotect() access checks")
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: only access file->f_cred after checking file is not NULL
> 
>  security/selinux/hooks.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Thanks for the update, this looks good to me.  I'm going to merge it into
selinux/stable-7.2 now and send it up to Linus later assuming all goes
well.

--
paul-moore.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.