Re: [PATCH v3] selinux_restorecon: Do not exit on directory cycles
Stephen Smalley <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:35:19 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.selinux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEjxPJ5GOSRAKiSi5Je0b_Us6tJrDZ8dfRhgpJLp5MjzJjYGtw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 8:53 AM Johannes Segitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > All other failures are handled gracefully. Directory cycles can e.g. > happen on BTRFS filesystems with subvolumes. Skip them and continue > instead of exiting > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Segitz <[email protected]> > --- > libselinux/src/selinux_restorecon.c | 11 +++++------ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libselinux/src/selinux_restorecon.c b/libselinux/src/selinux_restorecon.c > index 30f1b836..fdefc92c 100644 > --- a/libselinux/src/selinux_restorecon.c > +++ b/libselinux/src/selinux_restorecon.c > @@ -1393,15 +1393,14 @@ static void *selinux_restorecon_thread(void *arg) > if (is_dir) { > if (descend && walk_is_cycle(state, ent_sb.st_dev, > ent_sb.st_ino)) { > - selinux_log(SELINUX_ERROR, > + selinux_log(SELINUX_WARNING, > "Directory cycle on %s.\n", > ent_path); > close(ent_fd); > - close(rd_fd); > - errno = ELOOP; > - state->error = -1; > - state->abort = true; > - goto finish; > + if (rd_fd >= 0) > + close(rd_fd); As before, you don't need the if (rd_fd >= 0) test here because this is under an if (descend...) so it is a tautology. And i thought you were going to explicitly note the change in behavior via e.g. a man page update or similar? > + prune_pathbuf(state); > + continue; > } > > if (state->sfsb.f_type == SYSFS_MAGIC && > -- > 2.55.0 > >