Re: [PATCH v4] sparc: don't reference obsolete termio struct for TC* constants

Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.sparclinux,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-02-04 14:40, Sam James wrote:
> Similar in nature to commit ab107276607a ("powerpc: Fix struct termio related ioctl macros").
> 
> glibc-2.42 drops the legacy termio struct, but the ioctls.h header still
> defines some TC* constants in terms of termio (via sizeof). Hardcode the
> values instead.
> 
> This fixes building Python for example, which falls over like:
>   ./Modules/termios.c:1119:16: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct termio'
> 
> Link: https://bugs.gentoo.org/961769
> Link: https://bugs.gentoo.org/962600
> Signed-off-by: Sam James <[email protected]>
> ---
> v4: Tweak commit message for commit ref and add comments for old definitions.
> v3: Fix constants.
> v2: Fix title.
> 
>  arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h
> index 7fd2f5873c9e..a8bbdf9877a4 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h
> @@ -5,10 +5,10 @@
>  #include <asm/ioctl.h>
>  
>  /* Big T */
> -#define TCGETA		_IOR('T', 1, struct termio)
> -#define TCSETA		_IOW('T', 2, struct termio)
> -#define TCSETAW		_IOW('T', 3, struct termio)
> -#define TCSETAF		_IOW('T', 4, struct termio)
> +#define TCGETA          0x40125401 /* _IOR('T', 1, struct termio) */
> +#define TCSETA          0x80125402 /* _IOW('T', 2, struct termio) */
> +#define TCSETAW         0x80125403 /* _IOW('T', 3, struct termio) */
> +#define TCSETAF         0x80125404 /* _IOW('T', 4, struct termio) */
>  #define TCSBRK		_IO('T', 5)
>  #define TCXONC		_IO('T', 6)
>  #define TCFLSH		_IO('T', 7)


Reviewed-by: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>

Picking this up to my for-next.

Thanks,
Andreas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.