Re: rt: printk: create bogus deferred print functions (V2)

On 2023-05-24 23:14:17 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > My question is whether I should use the workaround or something like
> > what Clark did in v5.15-rt:
> > 
> >     449f5e1c4ddef Revert "printk: remove deferred printing"
> > 
> > Which brings back all of deferred printing. I do hope, for my sanity, that
> > the answer is "workaround", but whatever you suggest is good for me :)
> 
> The original patch failed on aarch64. So I expanded the patch a bit and
> changed description, making it an extension of the deferred printing
> removal already in tree. The question remains the same. :)

I missed that this got reverted in the v5.15 tree. Please see what I
wrote to your release email. And this deferred thingy needs to go back
into v5.15.

Sebastian