Re: PREEMPT_RT testing on kernelci

On 2025-02-11 07:33:57 [-0800], Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Unrelated to KernelCI - how stable is PREEMPT_RT in practice ? Reason
> for asking is that I enabled it for x86_64 together with lock
> debugging and got an almost immediate "sleeping function called"
> backtrace.

If I would have seen it I would have acted. My guess is that this is
something not a lot of people observed.

> Thanks,
> Guenter

Sebastian