Re: PREEMPT_RT testing on kernelci

---- On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:11:13 -0300 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> wrote ---

 > On 2025-04-17 10:10:43 [-0300], Gustavo Padovan wrote: 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > ---- On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 07:04:10 -0300 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> wrote --- 
 > > 
 > >  > On 2025-04-14 12:14:44 [-0300], Gustavo Padovan wrote: 
 > >  > > Hi Sebastian, 
 > >  > Hi Gustavo, 
 > >  > 
 > >  > > In my understanding you want to know when results for any rt-tests change status (eg PASS -> FAIL or 
 > >  > > vice versa) for a selection of trees (eg mainline, next, etc). Can you confirm? 
 > >  > 
 > >  > The results change is definitely interesting. The other thing is what is 
 > >  > tested and how. I remember you added/ changed some architectures for the 
 > >  > RT subset. I also assume that warnings at bootime (as in lockdep or 
 > >  > general warnings) are reported. 
 > > 
 > > We have some support around that, but this work is still evolving. 
 >  
 > Okay. 
 >  
 > >  > I remember Daniel asked for some cyclictests/rt-tests integration so I 
 > >  > don't know what is tested here ;) 
 > >  > 
 > >  > From the commandline you sent that there are a few boards running the 
 > >  > cyclictests and everything either passes or is in state "INCONCLUSIVE". 
 > >  > So this looks nice. 
 > > 
 > > Okay. 
 > > 
 > > As for notifications, for which trees/branches you want to see it? 
 >  
 > Linus' master and the -next tree would be good. If you plan add to add 
 > Cc here, it would be nice if you could add [email protected] 

Sounds good. Let me look at how to enable that in the coming weeks, as 
today we don't support report "profiles"  for a given tree.. Eg, the mainline
report comes with all the tests[1], but that would be noise to you.

[0]  https://groups.io/g/kernelci-results/message/58797


Best,

- Gus