Re: Quick note about v5.10.199-rt97-rc1

On 2023-10-25 23:16:08 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> Hello fellow maintainers!
> 
> I just pushed v5.10.199-rt97-rc1 (v5.10-rt-next) to kernel.org for testing.
> 
> The merge worked flawlessly but the build test failed with an undefined
> function. That was easy to track and fix, but I am not sure if the method
> I chose for the fix is the desired one.
> 
> In short, I performed the merge and then added the following patch to fix
> the build issue. Is this OK or should I have added this extra code in the
> merge?
> 
> Also, for the release, should I send the usual stable update message and
> add a note such as "the following change was required to fix a build
> problem: ..."?

Just looked at your v5.10.199-rt97-rc1 and considering everything it is
good. You could that a build failure was fixed due to upstream changes
affecting only the PREEMPT_RT part.

> Best regards,
> Luis

Sebastian