Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] usb: misc: usbio: reject endpoints smaller than the packet header

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.stable,org.kernel.vger.linux-i2c,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb
Message-ID <2026080209-satin-existing-5450@gregkh>
On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 08:35:07PM +0900, HE WEI (ギカク) wrote:
> usbio_ctrl_msg() and usbio_bulk_msg() bound the caller's transfer sizes
> against the endpoint packet size minus the fixed protocol header:
> 
> 	if ((obuf_len > (usbio->txbuf_len - sizeof(*bpkt))) ||
> 	    (ibuf_len > (usbio->txbuf_len - sizeof(*bpkt))))
> 		return -EMSGSIZE;
> 
> usbio->txbuf_len is a u16 and sizeof(*bpkt) is a size_t, so the
> subtraction is done in size_t.  struct usbio_bulk_packet is 5 bytes and
> struct usbio_ctrl_packet is 4 bytes, so any endpoint smaller than that
> makes the expression wrap to a value close to ULONG_MAX, both
> comparisons become false and the check is disabled.
> 
> txbuf_len and rxbuf_len come from the bulk endpoint wMaxPacketSize.
> usb_parse_endpoint() only clamps wMaxPacketSize downwards, it never
> enforces a lower bound:
> 
> 	if (maxp > j) {
> 		dev_notice(ddev, "... has invalid maxpacket %d, setting to %d\n",
> 		    ..., maxp, j);
> 		maxp = j;
> 		endpoint->desc.wMaxPacketSize = cpu_to_le16(i | maxp);
> 	}
> 
> A wMaxPacketSize of 0 is merely logged with dev_notice(), and a bulk
> endpoint declaring 1 is accepted verbatim.  usb_submit_urb() rejects
> maxpacket 0, but nothing rejects 1.
> 
> A device claiming one of the ids in usbio_table[] and advertising a bulk
> out endpoint with wMaxPacketSize 1 therefore ends up with a one byte
> usbio->txbuf, and the very first I2C transfer reaches usbio_bulk_msg()
> via usbio_i2c_init() with obuf_len = 7.  The wrapped check passes and the
> packet header stores overflow the slab object before memcpy() is even
> reached:
> 
> 	bpkt = usbio->txbuf;
> 	bpkt->header.type = type;	/* txbuf[0] */
> 	bpkt->header.cmd = cmd;		/* txbuf[1], out of bounds */
> 	bpkt->header.flags = ...;	/* txbuf[2], out of bounds */
> 	bpkt->len = cpu_to_le16(obuf_len);	/* txbuf[3..4] */
> 	memcpy(bpkt->data, obuf, obuf_len);	/* txbuf[5..] */
> 
> Note that this is all complete before usb_bulk_msg() is called, so it
> does not depend on the host controller being willing to run a transfer
> on such an endpoint.  With KASAN it is a slab-out-of-bounds write.
> Through usbio_i2c_write() obuf_len becomes sizeof(struct usbio_i2c_rw) +
> msg->len, so the length and the contents of the overflow are controlled
> by whoever can issue I2C transfers, up to the 4096 byte adapter limit.
> 
> wMaxPacketSize 0 is worse in a different way: devm_kzalloc(dev, 0)
> returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR rather than NULL, so the existing
> 
> 	if (!usbio->txbuf)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> does not catch it and the same header stores dereference ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
> usbio_bulk_recv() has the same problem on the receive side: it reads
> bpkt->header.flags at offset 2 of usbio->rxbuf before any length
> validation.
> 
> The control side is different.  For low, full and high speed hub.c
> forces ep0 wMaxPacketSize to 8, 16, 32 or 64, all larger than the
> control header, so usbio_ctrl_msg()'s check cannot wrap there.  For
> SuperSpeed it accepts any bMaxPacketSize0 that encodes a non-zero value:
> 
> 	i = maxp0;
> 	if (udev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER) {
> 		if (maxp0 <= 16)
> 			i = 1 << maxp0;
> 		else
> 			i = 0;		/* Invalid */
> 	}
> 
> combined with "(udev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER && i > 0)" below, so
> bMaxPacketSize0 of 0 or 1 gives a ctrlbuf of 1 or 2 bytes and the same
> wrap, during the five usbio_ctrl_msg() calls in usbio_probe().  Whether
> a given host controller will operate such an ep0 has not been
> established; the control length is checked here regardless so that the
> invariant is stated once for all three buffers.
> 
> Validate the three lengths in usbio_probe(), which is the only place
> that assigns them, instead of hardening each arithmetic site.  A bridge
> whose endpoints cannot even carry the protocol header is unusable, so
> refusing to probe is the correct outcome.  Rejecting the equal case as
> well is deliberate: it does not wrap, but it leaves no room for a
> payload, and excluding it makes every "<buf>_len - sizeof(*pkt)" in the
> driver a valid size of at least one.
> 
> No supported bridge is affected.  The low, full and high speed devices
> this driver binds to have an ep0 packet size of at least 8, and they use
> bulk endpoints of 64, or 63 via USBIO_QUIRK_BULK_MAXP_63.
> 
> Found by code review, doing variant analysis on the code around
> 8c6314489550.  The overflow was reproduced under AddressSanitizer with a
> userspace model of usbio_probe() and usbio_bulk_msg() that uses this
> driver's struct definitions, checks and stores verbatim; it has not been
> exercised on hardware or on dummy_hcd.
> 
> Fixes: 121a0f839dbb ("usb: misc: Add Intel USBIO bridge driver")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5 asan
> Signed-off-by: HE WEI (ギカク) <[email protected]>
> ---
> --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbio.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/usbio.c
> @@ -577,6 +577,24 @@

This is a very odd diff, what tool created it?  Did "Claude" manually
write a diff?  Please use the correct git diff output so that we can
correctly validate it is proper.

thanks,

greg k-h
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.