[PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: arm64: Handle VNCR TLB invalidation race with vcpu_put() VNCR unmapping

Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.stable,dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.kvm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
While VNCR TLB invalidation always occurs under the MMU lock,
vcpu_put() doesn't, while it unmaps the VNCR page.

The problem is that the invalidation evaluates vncr_tlb::cpu to
decide whether an unmapping needs to take place (cpu != -1) before
performing it. On the other hand, this_cpu_reset_vncr_fixmap()
unconditionally unmaps if L1_VNCR_MAPPED is set.

These two obviously can race, with a TOCTOU pattern on the TLBI
path, and a BUG_ON() on the vcpu_put() path. And the two can end-up
calling vncr_fixmap(-1), with extra lethal effects.

Move the reset of vncr_tlb::cpu to -1 to a common function, and make
this update atomic so that only a single thread can reset the field
and perform the corresponding unmap. The vcpu_put() still need to
unconditionally unmap the current VNCR to close another ugly race.

Finally, the assignment of vncr_tlb::cpu is moved to be kept in sync
with the actual mapping, similar to L1_VNCR_MAPPED being set.

Fixes: 7270cc9157f47 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Handle VNCR_EL2 invalidation from MMU notifiers")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index 8a602d074dbb4..cf0d45059edbd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct vncr_tlb {
 	bool			hpa_writable;
 
 	/* -1 when not mapped on a CPU */
-	int			cpu;
+	atomic_t		cpu;
 
 	/*
 	 * true if the TLB is valid. Can only be changed with the
@@ -894,16 +894,40 @@ void kvm_vcpu_load_hw_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Unmapping an L1 VNCR can happen concurrently without the mmu lock being
+ * effective (vcpu_put() vs TLBI handling). The atomic_xchg below ensures
+ * that only one CPU sets it to -1 while getting a valid CPU number back.
+ */
+static int unmap_l1_vncr(struct vncr_tlb *vt)
+{
+	int cpu = atomic_xchg_relaxed(&vt->cpu, -1);
+
+	if (cpu != -1)
+		clear_fixmap(vncr_fixmap(cpu));
+
+	return cpu;
+}
+
 static void this_cpu_reset_vncr_fixmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	if (!host_data_test_flag(L1_VNCR_MAPPED))
 		return;
 
-	BUG_ON(vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb->cpu != smp_processor_id());
 	BUG_ON(is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu));
 
-	clear_fixmap(vncr_fixmap(vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb->cpu));
-	vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb->cpu = -1;
+	/*
+	 * Unconditionally unmap the local VNCR if we have lost the race
+	 * against a concurrent TLBI. Otherwise we could end-up running
+	 * another vcpu with VNCR still mapped if the TLBI thread is
+	 * preempted between the exchange and the clear_fixmap().
+	 *
+	 * Note that we do not care about the TLBI nuking the fixmap behind
+	 * the back of an running vcpu. This will only generate a fault and
+	 * possibly a retranslation.
+	 */
+	if (unmap_l1_vncr(vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb) == -1)
+		clear_fixmap(vncr_fixmap(smp_processor_id()));
 	host_data_clear_flag(L1_VNCR_MAPPED);
 }
 
@@ -995,8 +1019,7 @@ u16 get_asid_by_regime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum trans_regime regime)
 static void invalidate_vncr(struct vncr_tlb *vt)
 {
 	vt->valid = false;
-	if (vt->cpu != -1)
-		clear_fixmap(vncr_fixmap(vt->cpu));
+	unmap_l1_vncr(vt);
 }
 
 static bool vncr_tlb_intersects(struct vncr_tlb *vt, u64 addr,
@@ -1452,7 +1475,7 @@ static int kvm_translate_vncr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_gmem)
 		vt->hpa = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 		vt->hpa_writable = writable;
 		vt->valid = true;
-		vt->cpu = -1;
+		atomic_set(&vt->cpu, -1);
 
 		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_MAP_L1_VNCR_EL2, vcpu);
 		kvm_release_faultin_page(vcpu->kvm, page, false, vt->wr.pw && vt->hpa_writable);
@@ -1583,8 +1606,6 @@ static void kvm_map_l1_vncr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (vt->wr.nG && get_asid_by_regime(vcpu, TR_EL20) != vt->wr.asid)
 		return;
 
-	vt->cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
 	if (vt->hpa_writable && vt->wr.pw && vt->wr.pr)
 		prot = PAGE_KERNEL;
 	else if (vt->wr.pr)
@@ -1599,7 +1620,8 @@ static void kvm_map_l1_vncr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 * FIXME: WO doesn't work at all, need POE support in the kernel.
 	 */
 	if (pgprot_val(prot) != pgprot_val(PAGE_NONE)) {
-		__set_fixmap(vncr_fixmap(vt->cpu), vt->hpa, prot);
+		atomic_set(&vt->cpu, smp_processor_id());
+		__set_fixmap(vncr_fixmap(atomic_read(&vt->cpu)), vt->hpa, prot);
 		host_data_set_flag(L1_VNCR_MAPPED);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.47.3
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.