Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] dt-bindings: media: qcom,venus: Add context bank subnodes to common schema
Bryan O'Donoghue <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.stable,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-media |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/08/2026 08:57, Vikash Garodia wrote:
> On 8/6/2026 1:24 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 06/08/2026 06:21, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>> On 8/1/2026 3:36 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>> On 31/07/2026 19:22, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>>> Fixes: 41661853ae8e ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: add iris DT node")
>>>>> Cc:[email protected]
>>>>> Tested-by: Daniel J Blueman<[email protected]>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vikash Garodia<[email protected]>
>>>> What about venus ?
>>> Plan is to get the reviews for IRIS3 family SOCs, once we have a go
>>> ahead from binding/DT maintainers, i can either bring in few series
>>> for remaining venus and iris SOC family OR do all of them in one
>>> single series. My preference would be to add in multiple series.
>> I still don't see why we can't just set
>>
>> minItems: 1 for the memory nodes - implement a fix for stable and then
>> iterate around this new way at leisure.
> you can follow the guidance from binding maintainer [1] and continue to
> discuss in the same thread if you have any question.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/2b0ea2a2-c3ef-4147-801b-
> [email protected]/
LoL seriously - system resetting bug.
How long exactly is this going to take - do you have buy in for
sub-nodes and when will that get merged.
For reference I do not care what happens my concern is an unspecified
window where stuff remains broken and we take our leisurely time about
doing something about it.
If we can't target something for -stable then this driver and venus
should be marked as BROKEN.
---
bod