Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] s390/vfio-ap: Fix use of wrong lock in mdev probe function

On 8/11/26 2:44 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>> Sashiko reports that this patch introduces a regression, which seems
>>> valid.
>>>
>>> AFAICT you resolve this regression with patch 7 of this series.
>>>
>>> For the sake of bisect, can you look at whether squashing these 2
>>> patches together would work so that we don't have an interim regression?
>> The reason for the two different patches is because the shah on the
>> Fixes: tag
>> differ.
>>
> That's not a good enough reason to break bisect and introduce a regression.

Then I guess I'll squash them and use the commit that introduced the bug in
the probe function.

>
>