Re: [PATCH 04/22] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Reserve low IOVA range for Iris

On 11/08/2026 01:17, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> You are well aware of them, but still asking the same. Reasons,
>> 1. We have been attempting the subnodes for almost a year with multiple
>> pushbacks from multiple maintainers. We are closer and working on it to post
>> for iris, followed by venus, once review is acceptable for iris.
> I think that we should have concentrated on it.  From my point of view,
> the subnodes solution is ready and the last obstacle was the
> under-informing commit message. As you can see, Rob has (had?) questions
> about this solution too.

Its taking too long.

I just suggested restricting concurrency but, that can't be right. The 
issue is IOVA - concurrency merely makes the bug more _likely_ to show 
up so in fact that won't work.

-rc1 hits soon, if sub-nodes isn't ready to go by that point there is no 
choice but to implement BROKEN or minItems, 100% up to qcom to decide which.

---
bod