Re: [PATCH 6.12.y 2/3] i2c: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls
Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Sasha, On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 06:13:46AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> > > [ Upstream commit ae11e08c3d0c78d08dac4cea30bf39ede2130b03 ] > > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(), > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> > Stable-dep-of: b08c9857aa1f ("i2c: qcom-cci: drop custom suspend/resume and rely on runtime PM helpers") > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Please don't. The patch adding pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() call to pm_request_autosuspend() was merged in 6.17 so before this version the explicit pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls are not redundant. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus