Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: sch_taprio: do not requeue a deactivated qdisc
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.stable,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2026 13:19:36 -0700 Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote: > David Lee <[email protected]> writes: > > > From: Kyle Zeng <[email protected]> > > > > Root qdisc replacement and deletion call dev_deactivate() without > > resetting the old qdisc. This marks the qdisc deactivated and waits for > > existing runs to finish, but leaves TAPRIO's private hrtimer active. > > advance_sched() can therefore requeue the old root after the final busy > > check, allowing a new run to overlap reset and destruction. > > > > Do not schedule TAPRIO after its root has been deactivated. Keep the > > test in the existing RCU read-side critical section so that it pairs > > with the synchronize_net() in dev_deactivate_many(): a callback which > > observes an active qdisc must finish before the final busy check, while > > a later callback observes the deactivated state and skips the requeue. > > > > Fixes: 5a781ccbd19e ("tc: Add support for configuring the taprio scheduler") > > Cc: [email protected] > > Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol Codex:gpt-5.5-cyber > > Signed-off-by: Kyle Zeng <[email protected]> > > Co-developed-by: David Lee <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: David Lee <[email protected]> > > --- > > Bug found and triaged by OpenAI Security Research and > > validated by Trail of Bits. > > > > The supplied v7.2-rc3 trace contains a KASAN use-after-free. The > > reproducer did not trigger a sanitizer report in the current v7.2-rc5 > > campaign and can be shared if needed. > > > > net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c > > index 299234a5f..2cf76df43 100644 > > --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c > > +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c > > @@ -990,7 +990,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart advance_sched(struct hrtimer *timer) > > hrtimer_set_expires(&q->advance_timer, end_time); > > > > rcu_read_lock(); > > - __netif_schedule(sch); > > + if (!test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED, &sch->state)) > > + __netif_schedule(sch); > > rcu_read_unlock(); > > > > I'll be the first one to admit that taprio is a weird one (that it keeps > a timer around while it's running among others), but it looks to me that > this check would make more sense inside __netif_schedule(). > > Let's see what others think. see the clashiko AI comment below. If that's true and indeed problem did not exist before 47e8dbb6e763e5 -- then the fix is misplaced, like you say. (I'm not sure about __netif_schedule(), to be clear, but some_qdisc_is_busy() is not strong enough?) The changelog opens with: "Root qdisc replacement and deletion call dev_deactivate() without resetting the old qdisc." Is that true for the trees the Fixes: tag points at? That behaviour looks like it arrives with 47e8dbb6e763e5 ("net/sched: do not reset queues in graft operations"), which added the reset_needed argument and made qdisc_graft() use: net/sched/sch_api.c:qdisc_graft() { ... if (dev->flags & IFF_UP) dev_deactivate(dev, false); ... } Before that, dev_deactivate_many() ran dev_reset_queue() on every txq unconditionally, and it did so before the some_qdisc_is_busy() wait loop. dev_reset_queue() resets rtnl_dereference(dev_queue->qdisc_sleeping), which in the root-graft path is still the old taprio qdisc, so qdisc_reset() -> taprio_reset() -> hrtimer_cancel() disarmed advance_timer before the busy check, and nothing re-arms it outside taprio_change()/taprio_start_sched() under RTNL. If that reading is right, the requeue-after-busy-check window does not exist without 47e8dbb6e763e5, but the patch carries Fixes: 5a781ccbd19e ("tc: Add support for configuring the taprio scheduler") plus Cc: stable, which aims it at every stable tree back to v4.20. Should the Fixes: tag name the commit that made dev_deactivate() skip the reset, and should the changelog mention that this reset-skipping behaviour is a recent change, so the backport range is clear? -- pw-bot: cr