Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: khugepaged: fix folio is used after pte_unmap_unlock()
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.stable,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aoMynfFI2XK2UXXN@lucifer> |
On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 01:19:23PM +0800, Vernon Yang wrote: > From: Vernon Yang <[email protected]> > > After the page table lock has dropped, the folio can be freed > concurrently. The trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd() is left with > a dangling folio pointer. > > So using the folio_pfn() before dropping the page table lock, > closing use-after-free window. > > Fixes: 7d2eba0557c1 ("mm: add tracepoint for scanning pages") > Cc: [email protected] > Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <[email protected]> > --- > include/trace/events/huge_memory.h | 6 +++--- > mm/khugepaged.c | 4 +++- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h b/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h > index d3572d4ef453..5dc71d292f47 100644 > --- a/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h > @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ SCAN_STATUS > > TRACE_EVENT(mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd, > > - TP_PROTO(struct mm_struct *mm, struct folio *folio, > + TP_PROTO(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pfn, > int referenced, int none_or_zero, int status, int unmapped), > > - TP_ARGS(mm, folio, referenced, none_or_zero, status, unmapped), > + TP_ARGS(mm, pfn, referenced, none_or_zero, status, unmapped), > > TP_STRUCT__entry( > __field(struct mm_struct *, mm) > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd, > > TP_fast_assign( > __entry->mm = mm; > - __entry->pfn = folio ? folio_pfn(folio) : -1; > + __entry->pfn = pfn; > __entry->referenced = referenced; > __entry->none_or_zero = none_or_zero; > __entry->status = status; > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c > index e7830761d3a2..7c8c48577408 100644 > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c > @@ -1603,6 +1603,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, > enum scan_result result = SCAN_FAIL; > struct page *page = NULL; > struct folio *folio = NULL; > + unsigned long pfn = -1; > unsigned long addr; > unsigned long enabled_orders; > spinlock_t *ptl; > @@ -1778,6 +1779,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, > result = SCAN_SUCCEED; > } > out_unmap: > + pfn = folio ? folio_pfn(folio) : -1; > pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); > if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED) { > /* collapse_huge_page expects the lock to be dropped before calling */ > @@ -1788,7 +1790,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, > *lock_dropped = true; > } > out: > - trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, folio, referenced, > + trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, pfn, referenced, Same comment as 1/3 I don't see why we should be storing a pfn value used nowhere else just for tracing. > none_or_zero, result, unmapped); > return result; > } > -- > 2.53.0 > -- Cheers, Lorenzo