[PATCH 5.10.y 2/2] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in TX_RING send path
Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Qihang Tang <[email protected]> [ Upstream commit 21b5953e7494c16a42e6cd8cf110e18d13ae4a6b ] tpacket_snd() reads dev->hard_header_len independently for skb allocation and header construction in tpacket_fill_skb(). Concurrent netdevice reconfiguration can therefore make the reserved headroom smaller than the amount later pushed, or make copylen - hard_header_len negative. Snapshot hard_header_len once before processing ring frames and use it for the frame limit, headroom allocation, copy length, and skb construction. Pass the snapshot to tpacket_fill_skb(). The separate SOCK_DGRAM consistency problem between hard_header_len and header_ops->create is not addressed here. Fixes: 69e3c75f4d54 ("net: TX_RING and packet mmap") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Qihang Tang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> [ Applied cleanly after amending the prerequisite that adds `LL_RESERVED_SPACE_EX()`; no target-side adaptation was needed. ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> --- net/packet/af_packet.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c index 4aa1976695a8a..3e72c77a8bc92 100644 --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c @@ -2582,6 +2582,7 @@ static int packet_snd_vnet_parse(struct msghdr *msg, size_t *len, static int tpacket_fill_skb(struct packet_sock *po, struct sk_buff *skb, void *frame, struct net_device *dev, void *data, int tp_len, __be16 proto, unsigned char *addr, int hlen, int copylen, + int hard_header_len, const struct sockcm_cookie *sockc) { union tpacket_uhdr ph; @@ -2613,8 +2614,8 @@ static int tpacket_fill_skb(struct packet_sock *po, struct sk_buff *skb, } else if (copylen) { int hdrlen = min_t(int, copylen, tp_len); - skb_push(skb, dev->hard_header_len); - skb_put(skb, copylen - dev->hard_header_len); + skb_push(skb, hard_header_len); + skb_put(skb, copylen - hard_header_len); err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, data, hdrlen); if (unlikely(err)) return err; @@ -2744,7 +2745,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg) void *data; int len_sum = 0; int status = TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE; - int hlen, tlen, copylen = 0; + int hard_header_len, hlen, tlen, copylen = 0; long timeo; mutex_lock(&po->pg_vec_lock); @@ -2791,8 +2792,9 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg) goto out_put; } + hard_header_len = READ_ONCE(dev->hard_header_len); if (po->sk.sk_socket->type == SOCK_RAW) - reserve = dev->hard_header_len; + reserve = hard_header_len; size_max = po->tx_ring.frame_size - (po->tp_hdrlen - sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll)); @@ -2829,7 +2831,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg) goto tpacket_error; status = TP_STATUS_SEND_REQUEST; - hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev); + hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE_EX(dev, hard_header_len); tlen = dev->needed_tailroom; if (po->has_vnet_hdr) { data += sizeof(vnet_hdr); @@ -2847,10 +2849,10 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg) vnet_hdr.hdr_len); has_vnet_hdr = true; } - copylen = max_t(int, copylen, dev->hard_header_len); + copylen = max_t(int, copylen, hard_header_len); skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&po->sk, hlen + tlen + sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll) + - (copylen - dev->hard_header_len), + (copylen - hard_header_len), !need_wait, &err); if (unlikely(skb == NULL)) { @@ -2860,7 +2862,8 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg) goto out_status; } tp_len = tpacket_fill_skb(po, skb, ph, dev, data, tp_len, proto, - addr, hlen, copylen, &sockc); + addr, hlen, copylen, hard_header_len, + &sockc); if (likely(tp_len >= 0) && tp_len > dev->mtu + reserve && !po->has_vnet_hdr && -- 2.53.0