Re: [PATCH net v3 4/6] net/sched: fq_pie: clamp default quantum to avoid signed overflow
Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.stable,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
On 8/22/26 9:55 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> fq_pie_init() sets q->quantum = psched_mtu(qdisc_dev(sch)) without
> clamping. A device with a huge MTU (e.g. dummy with max_mtu == 0
> accepting MTU 2147483634) makes psched_mtu() return 0x80000000, which
> overflows the signed flow->deficit to INT_MIN in fq_pie_qdisc_dequeue(),
> causing an infinite loop and soft lockup. Emulate fq_pie_policy which
> is already bounded to [1, 1 << 20]; clamp the default to [256, 1 << 20].
> 256 matches fq_codel's floor and is a sane minimum for a DRR quantum.
>
> Conditions to recreate the bug: a device whose MTU (plus
> hard_header_len) wraps psched_mtu() into the sign bit (e.g. a dummy
> device with max_mtu == 0 accepting MTU 2147483634). Requires
> CAP_NET_ADMIN in a user namespace.
>
> Fixes: ec97ecf1ebe4 ("net: sched: add Flow Queue PIE packet scheduler")
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Tested-by: Victor Nogueira <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/sched/sch_fq_pie.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_fq_pie.c b/net/sched/sch_fq_pie.c
> index 069e1facd413..b27d95418707 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_fq_pie.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_fq_pie.c
> @@ -427,7 +427,8 @@ static int fq_pie_init(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
> pie_params_init(&q->p_params);
> sch->limit = 10 * 1024;
> q->p_params.limit = sch->limit;
> - q->quantum = psched_mtu(qdisc_dev(sch));
> + q->quantum = clamp_t(u32, psched_mtu(qdisc_dev(sch)),
> + 256, 1 << 20);
Sashiko thinks that the soft lookup is still reachable via pie_change:
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260822195509.112717-1-jhs%40mojatatu.com
and has similar concerns for patch 6/6, too. It marks the issues as
pre-existing, but AFAICS they overlap with the things addressed here.
WDYT?
/P