Re: [PATCH 05/15] fs: afs: correctly drop reference count on mapping failure
"Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.target-devel,dev.linux.lists.linux-staging,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-hyperv,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 04:07:43AM -0700, Usama Arif wrote: > On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 20:27:20 +0000 "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Commit 9d5403b1036c ("fs: convert most other generic_file_*mmap() users to > > .mmap_prepare()") updated AFS to use the mmap_prepare callback in favour of > > the deprecated mmap callback. > > > > However, it did not account for the fact that mmap_prepare can fail to map > > due to an out of memory error, and thus should not be incrementing a > > reference count on mmap_prepare. > > > > With the newly added vm_ops->mapped callback available, we can simply defer > > this operation to that callback which is only invoked once the mapping is > > successfully in place (but not yet visible to userspace as the mmap and VMA > > write locks are held). > > > > Therefore add afs_mapped() to implement this callback for AFS. > > > > In practice the mapping allocations are 'too small to fail' so this is > > something that realistically should never happen in practice (or would do > > so in a case where the process is about to die anyway), but we should still > > handle this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <[email protected]> > > --- > > fs/afs/file.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/afs/file.c b/fs/afs/file.c > > index f609366fd2ac..69ef86f5e274 100644 > > --- a/fs/afs/file.c > > +++ b/fs/afs/file.c > > @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ static ssize_t afs_file_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos, > > static void afs_vm_open(struct vm_area_struct *area); > > static void afs_vm_close(struct vm_area_struct *area); > > static vm_fault_t afs_vm_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf, pgoff_t start_pgoff, pgoff_t end_pgoff); > > +static int afs_mapped(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, pgoff_t pgoff, > > + const struct file *file, void **vm_private_data); > > > > const struct file_operations afs_file_operations = { > > .open = afs_open, > > @@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ const struct address_space_operations afs_file_aops = { > > }; > > > > static const struct vm_operations_struct afs_vm_ops = { > > + .mapped = afs_mapped, > > .open = afs_vm_open, > > .close = afs_vm_close, > > .fault = filemap_fault, > > @@ -500,13 +503,22 @@ static int afs_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc) > > afs_add_open_mmap(vnode); > > Is the above afs_add_open_mmap an additional one, which could cause a reference > leak? Does the above one need to be removed and only the one in afs_mapped() > needs to be kept? Ah yeah good spot, will fix thanks! > > > > > ret = generic_file_mmap_prepare(desc); > > - if (ret == 0) > > - desc->vm_ops = &afs_vm_ops; > > - else > > - afs_drop_open_mmap(vnode); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + desc->vm_ops = &afs_vm_ops; > > return ret; > > } > > > > +static int afs_mapped(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, pgoff_t pgoff, > > + const struct file *file, void **vm_private_data) > > +{ > > + struct afs_vnode *vnode = AFS_FS_I(file_inode(file)); > > + > > + afs_add_open_mmap(vnode); > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > static void afs_vm_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > > { > > afs_add_open_mmap(AFS_FS_I(file_inode(vma->vm_file))); > > -- > > 2.53.0 > > > > Cheers, Lorenzo