Re: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: ipr: use kmalloc() to allocate IPR dump buffer memory
Brian King <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Jul 2026 14:56:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.target-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/2/26 1:55 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 04:03:48PM -0500, Brian King wrote: >> On 7/1/26 4:52 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 09:03:06AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >>>> On 6/30/26 12:54 PM, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote: >>>>> IPR dump machinery allocates memory to save adapter's crash dump using >>>>> __get_free_page(). >>>>> >>>>> This memory can be allocated with kmalloc() as there's nothing special >>>>> about it to go directly to the page allocator. >>>>> >>>>> kmalloc() provides a better API that does not require ugly casts and >>>>> kfree() does not need to know the size of the freed object. >>>>> >>>>> Replace use of __get_free_page() with kmalloc(). >>>>> >>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] >>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 4 ++-- >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c >>>>> index d207e5e81afe..5a212bfdeec2 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c >>>>> @@ -2893,7 +2893,7 @@ static int ipr_sdt_copy(struct ipr_ioa_cfg *ioa_cfg, >>>>> (ioa_dump->hdr.len + bytes_copied) < max_dump_size) { >>>>> if (ioa_dump->page_offset >= PAGE_SIZE || >>>>> ioa_dump->page_offset == 0) { >>>>> - page = (__be32 *)__get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC); >>>>> + page = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC); >>>>> if (!page) { >>>>> ipr_trace; >>>>> @@ -3226,7 +3226,7 @@ static void ipr_release_dump(struct kref *kref) >>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(ioa_cfg->host->host_lock, lock_flags); >>>>> for (i = 0; i < dump->ioa_dump.next_page_index; i++) >>>>> - free_page((unsigned long) dump->ioa_dump.ioa_data[i]); >>>>> + kfree(dump->ioa_dump.ioa_data[i]); >>>>> vfree(dump->ioa_dump.ioa_data); >>>>> kfree(dump); >>>>> >>>> >>>> I _think_ we can replace this with kvmalloc, and allocate the entire >>>> dump buffer in one go. Once switched to kmalloc() it's kinda pointless >>>> to allocate separate page-sized buffers here. >>> >>> kmalloc() performance is on par with __get_free_page(), but kvmalloc() >>> would be slower if it falls back to vmalloc(). >>> >>> I'm not familiar with the driver to say if this could be an issue here. >> >> This code only runs when the adapter has hit a fatal error, so should be >> extremely rare. The memory is getting allocated while the storage adapter >> is in a failed state, so anything running on the system at the time could >> be stalled until recovery is completed. This memory is allocated and should >> be freed soon after the adapter recovers. In order for this code to >> run, the iprdump daemon must be running, which will then read out the dump >> after the adapter is recovered, and write it to disk, after which time, the >> ipr driver will free the kernel memory. > > Thanks for the explanation! > > So the allocation is not on the hot path and it seems to me that > performance differences between kmalloc() and slower vmalloc() won't move a > needle relatively to the entire dump procedure. > > And it seems that GFP_ATOMIC here is a historical artifact rather than > actual necessity. ipr_get_ioa_dump() runs in a workqueue context without > locks held so nothing warrants GFP_ATOMIC. Agree that GFP_ATOMIC is not needed here, but we probably do need GFP_NOIO since we don't want these allocations starting I/O as the storage adapter is not in a state where it can handle I/O until the card is reset. Thanks, Brian -- Brian King Power Linux I/O IBM Linux Technology Center