Re: [PATCH] RDMA/srpt: Fix srpt_alloc_rw_ctxs() unwind counters

On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 10:30:16AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> From: TanZheng <[email protected]>
> 
> When srpt_alloc_rw_ctxs() fails partway through a multi-buffer indirect
> descriptor, the unwind path destroys RDMA contexts but leaves stale
> n_rw_ctx and n_rdma values (and a dangling rw_ctxs pointer). Later
> sq_wr_avail accounting in srpt_queue_response() or srpt_write_pending()
> can then subtract the wrong number of send queue credits.
> 
> Reset the counters and rw_ctxs pointer before returning an error.
> 
> Fixes: b99f8e4d7bcd ("IB/srpt: convert to the generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
> Signed-off-by: TanZheng <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
> index f66cfd70c263..4644429fae14 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
> @@ -1016,6 +1016,9 @@ static int srpt_alloc_rw_ctxs(struct srpt_send_ioctx *ioctx,
>  	}
>  	if (ioctx->rw_ctxs != &ioctx->s_rw_ctx)
>  		kfree(ioctx->rw_ctxs);
> +	ioctx->rw_ctxs = &ioctx->s_rw_ctx;

This line seems questionable to me.
You probably need to write:
if (ioctx->rw_ctxs != &ioctx->s_rw_ctx) {
  kfree(ioctx->rw_ctxs);
  ioctx->rw_ctxs = NULL;
}

> +	ioctx->n_rw_ctx = 0;
> +	ioctx->n_rdma = 0;

These lines seem correct to me.

>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>