Re: lockdep: strange %s#5 lock name

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:32:53PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:26:45PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > It seems to me that when the second time alloc_workqueue() is called
> > > from the same code path, it would have two locks with the same key, but
> > > not the same &wq->name, which doesn't meet lockdep's assumption.
> > 
> > Dang...  I reverted the previous patch for now.  Peter, does this
> > approach sound good to you?
> 
> Whatever works I suppose; like Li said; a little ugly but not sure we
> can do better.

Cool, Li, can you please spin it on top of v3.14-rc1 w/ SOB and
description.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun