Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: fix rtnl locking in setsockopt for anycast and multicast

Cong Wang <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:23:37 -0700
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.trinity,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <CAHA+R7NSu=wjGsmLapjM4Mbk_oeZ07P+yN0b982otvjoW2jodA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What games are you playing? You know how patches are processed by David
> and I even let him the choice by pointing out a problem in your patch so
> that you could an update and send v2.

I assume David goes over all the discussion before applying any patch.
So in the original discussion, obviously I disagree with your point on RCU,
and sent my own version.

I do understand David may miss something due to massive emails in
this list, but you make no point here nor I understand your broken English
"let him the choice...".

>
> I really feel miffed about your behavior!
>

I SEE. Please do redirect my email to your /dev/null. Thanks a lot!

> Anyway, I saw the hunk adding the return -ENODEV and didn't see any
> problems with it. Sure it might be better if it would gone into a
> separate patch. Can you elaborate what problems you see?
>

Yes, it should be not in this patch at the very very least.