Re: poor feedback when misusing `losetup`
Benno Schulenberg <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Oct 2025 10:34:10 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.util-linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Op 09-10-2025 om 11:44 schreef Benno Schulenberg: > # losetup loop2 > losetup: loop2: failed to use device: No such device > > It results that when setting up a loop device, one can use the short > name, but when doing anything else, one needs to give the full path Sorry, I was using the system-installed `losetup` -- the `./losetup` from git accepts the plain name just fine. > # losetup -d /dev/loop2 > # losetup -d /dev/loop2 > losetup: /dev/loop2: detach failed: No such device or address > > "No such device"? So I request information about the device: > > # losetup /dev/loop2 > losetup: /dev/loop2: No such file or directory These inaccurate messages are still the case. Are they seem even more inaccurate when the user provides just the plain name (loop2) and the error message mentions the full name (/dev/loop2). Benno
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEFo5vQpe/16ea/USWUUu+Lrjhlh8FAmjoxQIFAwAAAAAACgkQUUu+Lrjhlh8k vg/+LHzx7nB4DUohDfFY99B0dJxIPRWQC0VEzlg9t09i60LwF4cjZ6DlXn3wKm4rCLzh1eKCfkEL BcPscqoMnjVzjmy+9GuzfsuhEx6TAvrojAgxscMDgjukEDP2sGGNNmatairXW88eSqPvpk81An7A IkWVaIOd/dqLh7Jfd0+2yC5d2SH0j5vVnO7Uy7osEAtbhqbw5+1BNelei6qY4KGqGFlvZwEHU4AG nlrBoVbCNSvtjLpKQfe8QNRrFvfJ/W0EKdCtB1Afx8vFKlC7yBoGXO8pl1siBYhKiZUKnEB4cCrD aNk7vNPMgLJV6ygVYvLYC6nJmMdFLyRUiLKCyz11Z4SHx0+aeGArVHUZQWldRNPaVLJ7oA3KULdm +djNwSlSuKomBekJPS8FB1qYdoDzSNSzaH/zaNQqAEfjyqwDg89j7NUw+JXMkjvnowHOESiUyUX8 YSmLfW5+ReorTaZR0QDd2di7xLvFmUi/LpV3eXn08aYBldwd/E0u61uQsdUitzjbd8vCZZ4CGdWT GFGYLvRfnxHBz8lP35NCPqbv4pwBfjAZiXEX9vFqQ6QUNPRypS355xVR7GaHoMrZb33+oGE7H0sa X2L3uThU1dPM35oF5uIA4hcXNZqTRNTPTcUrn+nLVwnNwLzwnyZ4VZzPLd7Q/s9b3TJg6jpBiM2u d0s= =SqWY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----