Re: poor feedback when misusing `losetup`

Benno Schulenberg <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Oct 2025 10:34:10 +0200
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.util-linux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Op 09-10-2025 om 11:44 schreef Benno Schulenberg:
>    # losetup loop2
>    losetup: loop2: failed to use device: No such device
> 
> It results that when setting up a loop device, one can use the short
> name, but when doing anything else, one needs to give the full path

Sorry, I was using the system-installed `losetup` -- the `./losetup`
from git accepts the plain name just fine.


>    # losetup -d /dev/loop2
>    # losetup -d /dev/loop2
>    losetup: /dev/loop2: detach failed: No such device or address
> 
> "No such device"?  So I request information about the device:
> 
>    # losetup /dev/loop2
>    losetup: /dev/loop2: No such file or directory

These inaccurate messages are still the case.  Are they seem even
more inaccurate when the user provides just the plain name (loop2)
and the error message mentions the full name (/dev/loop2).


Benno
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=SqWY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----