Re: [PATCH v2] x32: Implement prctl in assembly
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> Mon, 08 Dec 2025 10:09:59 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.util-linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* H. J. Lu: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 4:11 PM Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> * H. J. Lu: >> > Here is the v2 patch to implement prctl in assembly for x32. >> > >> > Since the variadic prctl function takes at most 5 integer arguments which >> > are passed in the same integer registers on x32 as the function with 5 >> > integer arguments, we can use assembly for prctl. Since upper 32-bits in >> > the last 4 arguments of prctl must be cleared to match the x32 prctl >> > syscall interface where the last 4 arguments are unsigned 64 bit longs, >> > implement prctl in assembly to clear upper 32-bits in the last 4 arguments >> > and add a test to verify it. >> >> What's the advantage of the assembler implementation over the C >> implementation? I'm missing the context for this change. >> > > It is inspired by > > commit 6a04404521ac4119ae36827eeb288ea84eee7cf6 > Author: Florian Weimer <[email protected]> > Date: Sat Feb 17 09:17:04 2024 +0100 > > Linux: Switch back to assembly syscall wrapper for prctl (bug 29770) The justification for that does not apply to x32, though, because prctl doesn't take floating point arguments. I don't have a strong opinion, the C and assembler versions are of similar complexity. Thanks, Florian