RE: [PATCH] mount: (manpage) add CephFS kernel client mount options
Viacheslav Dubeyko <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Jan 2026 19:29:00 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.util-linux,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2026-01-13 at 20:14 +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:58:38PM -0800, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <[email protected]> > > > > Currently, manpage for generic mount tool doesn't contain > > explanation of CephFS kernel client mount options. This patch > > adds the description of CephFS mount options into > > file system specific mount options section. > > > > Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <[email protected]> > > --- > > sys-utils/mount.8.adoc | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/sys-utils/mount.8.adoc b/sys-utils/mount.8.adoc > > index 4571bd2bfd16..191a3fabf501 100644 > > --- a/sys-utils/mount.8.adoc > > +++ b/sys-utils/mount.8.adoc > > @@ -853,6 +853,7 @@ This section lists options that are specific to particular filesystems. Where po > > |=== > > |*Filesystem(s)* |*Manual page* > > |btrfs |*btrfs*(5) > > +|cephfs |*mount.ceph*(8) > > It seems that all we need is this change. > > > |cifs |*mount.cifs*(8) > > |ext2, ext3, ext4 |*ext4*(5) > > |fuse |*fuse*(8) > > @@ -913,6 +914,91 @@ Give blocksize. Allowed values are 512, 1024, 2048, 4096. > > **grpquota**|**noquota**|**quota**|*usrquota*:: > > These options are accepted but ignored. (However, quota utilities may react to such strings in _/etc/fstab_.) > > > > +=== Mount options for ceph > > If mount.ceph(8) exists, we do not need to repeat the mount option in > mount(8). The ideal solution is to keep filesystem-specific mount > options in the filesystem-specific man page maintained by the > filesystem developer :-) See btrfs, extN, XFS, etc. > My assumption was that if other file systems have description of specific mount options in this man page, then CephFS should have too. :) But if it is not right strategy, then you are correct here. Let me shrink my patch then. Thanks, Slava.