Re: Bug#1132588: runuser: missing whitelist-environment option

Hey Chris,=0A=0AThe issue is indeed caused by the mentioned commit ac0147f,=
 however=0Athe change is necessary for proper functioning of su(1). Neverth=
eless, I=0Ahave created a PR that separates the short option strings used f=
or su(1)=0Aand runuser(1) as we need a different scanning mode for the form=
er.=0A=0AI have also added regression tests for runuser(1) and slightly imp=
roved=0Athe one for su(1) so we can catch regressions earlier.=0A=0AWith th=
e patch the issue with runuser should be fixed. Can you please=0Avalidate t=
his ?=0A=0APR: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/pull/4185=0A=0AEdit=
:=0A=0AAfter taking a closer look at the runuser(1) man page it seems to me=
 that=0Athe actual documented syntax implies that options should always be =
put=0Abefore the username and potential arguments that are to be passed to =
the=0Ashell or defined command. This aligns with the usage of su(1) and see=
ms=0Amore coherent. Let's see what Karel thinks about this :D=0A=0ARegards,=
=0A=0AChristian Goeschel Ndjomouo=0A