[PATCH] lscpu: prefer model over revision for the Model field

Current logic prefers ct->revision over ct->model whenever
revision is set. This is not appropriate for any
architecture that populates both fields, because the CPU
model (part number) is the meaningful identifier for the
"Model:" line, not the revision.

Make ct->model take precedence and use ct->revision only as
a fallback.

Signed-off-by: Lokanadha M R <[email protected]>
---
 sys-utils/lscpu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sys-utils/lscpu.c b/sys-utils/lscpu.c
index deb9b12bd..e52dc6312 100644
--- a/sys-utils/lscpu.c
+++ b/sys-utils/lscpu.c
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ print_summary_cputype(struct lscpu_cxt *cxt,
 	if (ct->family)
 		add_summary_s(tb, sec, _("CPU family:"), ct->family);
 	if (ct->model || ct->revision)
-		add_summary_s(tb, sec, _("Model:"), ct->revision ? ct->revision : ct->model);
+		add_summary_s(tb, sec, _("Model:"), ct->model ?: ct->revision);
 
 	add_summary_n(tb, sec, _("Thread(s) per core:"), ct->nthreads_per_core);
 	if (cxt->is_cluster)
-- 
2.34.1