Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Documentation: security-bugs: clarify requirements for AI-assisted reports
Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 06:53:11AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 12:30:10PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > >> > One nit: > >> > > >> > > + * **Impact Evaluation**: Many AI-generated reports lack an understanding of > >> > > + the kernel's threat model and go to great lengths inventing theoretical > >> > > + consequences. > >> > > >> > If only we had a shiny new document describing that threat model that we > >> > could reference here... :) > >> > >> Ah yes, a link to that would make things better, but don't we have that > >> elsewhere in this series? > > > > It's in the same patch, I think Jon was sarcastic here. I thought I had > > addressed that one but apparently I was wrong :-/ > > I'm just saying that this particular text should link to that document, > don't make readers go searching for it. I can certainly add a patch > doing that if you like. That would be kind, thank you Jon. Feel free to modify my patch if you haven't published it if you prefer. Thanks! willy