Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Documentation: security-bugs: clarify requirements for AI-assisted reports

On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 03:02:08PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 12:30:10PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> > One nit:
> >>> > 
> >>> > > +  * **Impact Evaluation**: Many AI-generated reports lack an understanding of
> >>> > > +    the kernel's threat model and go to great lengths inventing theoretical
> >>> > > +    consequences.
> >>> > 
> >>> > If only we had a shiny new document describing that threat model that we
> >>> > could reference here... :)
> >>> 
> >>> Ah yes, a link to that would make things better, but don't we have that
> >>> elsewhere in this series?
> >>
> >> It's in the same patch, I think Jon was sarcastic here. I thought I had
> >> addressed that one but apparently I was wrong :-/
> >
> > I'm just saying that this particular text should link to that document,
> > don't make readers go searching for it.  I can certainly add a patch
> > doing that if you like.
> 
> I was thinking something like this.
> 
> jon
> 
> >From 3f02a3c190bab6b54e2a250ead0c7408af1a3c51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 14:51:29 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] docs: security-bugs: add a link to the threat-model
>  documentation
> 
> Rather than make readers search for this document, just a link to it where
> it is referenced.
> 
> (While I was at it, I removed the unused and unneeded _threatmodel label
> from the top of threat-model.rst).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst | 13 +++++++------
>  Documentation/process/threat-model.rst  |  2 --
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Looks good, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>