Re: [PATCH v13 0/4] kunit: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

Albert Esteve <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest
Message-ID <CADSE00JVgP50vud_3uvvjg6HDeEwc1TsK0E=gSKV07jKtT+vMQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 3:51 PM Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Albert,
>
> On 5/15/26 05:29, Albert Esteve wrote:
> ...
>
> > Guenter Roeck (3):
> >        kunit: Add backtrace suppression self-tests
> >        drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests
> >        kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API
> >
>
>
> How much of that is from me at this point ? Wouldn't it make sense to drop me
> as "author" of those patches ?

Hi Guenter,

I do not mind authorship either. Signed-off-by lines already attest to
everyone's contribution.

In principle I am done with Sashiko's reviews. I addressed all
comments in their respective patches. Some lead to the rabbit holes I
put myself into for previous versions.

I do not plan to send a new version unless a human review requires a change.

If that happens, I may update the authorship. Otherwise, I'd keep it
as is, since you said you do not mind :)

Thanks!

BR,
Albert.

>
> I would not mind. I had the idea, but others like you are doing the hard work
> of pushing it through.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.