Re: Stop false review statements
Derek Barbosa <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.workflows,dev.linux.lists.sashiko,dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 03:28:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> Couldn't this be something like:
>
> AI-analysed-by: bot-X
+1
78d979db6cef5 ("docs: add AI Coding Assistants documentation") introduced the
coding-assistants document some time ago [0]. In that time span, we've
seen a quick rise in popularity for tools that leverage reviews through the use
of LLMs.
And while the document does call out general AI contributions with:
> Contributions should include an Assisted-by tag in the following format:
expanding it to include something like "AI-analyzed-by" would be nice.
> So, yeah, Reviewed-by is definetly for definetly persons, but having
> some tag that states that it went thru automated reviewing^Wanalysis by
> a definetly bot/thing/whatever that some people think is useful seems
> useful.
Agreed. I think there is a distinction (although a pedantic one) between a
Generated-by/Assisted-by and something like "AI-analyzed" :-)
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
--
Derek <[email protected]>