Re: Stop false review statements

Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.workflows,dev.linux.lists.sashiko,dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 16 May 2026 14:59:44 -0700
Roman Gushchin <[email protected]> wrote:

> > On May 16, 2026, at 2:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > I find it opposite: clogging commits with useless information, because
> > some arbitrary and completely closed-source tool did analysis means
> > nothing to me one year later when I look at the commit in the Git history.  
> 
> This is simple not true: Sashiko is fully open-source, under Apache 2.0 license
> and the code belongs to LF. 

> Yes, the instance behind sashiko.dev is using
> Gemini 3.1 Pro LLM, which is not open-source, but it’s not a fundamental limitation - 
> Sashiko is supporting various LLMs, including open models - it’s just a practical
> choice: to my knowledge the quality of open models is not on par with frontier closed
> models 

I would very much prefer using an open source LLM, even if not in pair 
with latest paid models.

> and it would require a non-trivial amount of hardware and infrastructure to run
> an open model at the required scale.

IMHO the best would be to have them running on some infra that would accept
open source models (*). If there aren't enough resources to have our own
infra, there are offers out there which allows running open source models
like https://ollama.com/pricing (I never used myself).

(*) For instance, Qwen3.6 is brand new and licensed under apache-2.0.
    Not bad on my tests running it locally.

Thanks,
Mauro
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.