Re: [PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: Clarify that in English "reviewer" is a person
Mark Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 04:39:45PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote: > On 5/16/26 14:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Our docs already clearly mark that "Reviewed-by" must come from a > > person: ... > > However this is not enough and apparently English is not that precise, > > so let's clarify that only a person can state the "Reviewer's statement > > of oversight". > I agree with the intent that the tag is for people (whether they use a tool > or not to help them). We also don't put "Tested-by: kernel test robot" or > syzkaller on every commit that they test and find no bugs. Review is also > not just about absence of bugs, but agreeing with the larger design and > whether the change makes sense to do in the first place. Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmoKztsACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BxQAf9HjcNGuz8X85z8nRyFk+Z7sojoG4NaYKs3NSgNc0ZYDvcAeGarzbey7fL 0oRLf/4xAGPkNJEcobvK8UCJ1gpKYJtBI6NqK9xguP3L252f6bOwg7fxaA0R1egp nGvDSpqpNnOe34f8TC8MDHg4S/bZKW7RrLlIBGWv2FC1IOptxsQDM8l8VD3gCkEe Nm944D//UM/fc8Xn23c8Bg166RqSc+YftLSYCThvRFUkjMq38FWiAVueqRKCZFYM t0nVVLgpT/ODSJteXKQ9SGzR2+fP+AX643GdtmINaXXvrEch9+lzhDU8xCVHmjiE wgr/Vb4hPpwxohJJkmFANVzutH6w1g== =diSE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----